Details, Fiction and superg168
Details, Fiction and superg168
Blog Article
A nearby Tremendous-G WLAN running a 2Mbps video clip stream will probably not cause major interference to an 11g WLAN that’s also streaming a movie.
It’s not likely you’d be significantly bothered by a neighbor’s closely made use of 802.11g WLAN even though looking at a wirelessly streamed video clip all on your own.
This time both equally the throughput and Lost Data plots are worth exhibiting, as you can Obviously see distinctions in both equally.
Observe: The subsequent spectrum diagrams are determined by Determine 1 and therefore are not completed to correct scale. Any inaccuracies are usually not intentional!
This meant employing a desktop device and 11g USB2.0 adapters within the 11g half of my testbed, which remained stationary for all tests.
Broadcom’s shot in Figure seven, nevertheless, displays an entire-energy Super-G sign overlapping into drawn-in markings for channels one and eleven so you’re sure to see the Super-G signal is essentially at full energy when it 1st overlaps into each “non-overlapping” channels.
โปรเดือนเกิด/วันเกิด หรือโปรเทศกาลสำคัญต่าง ๆ หรืออื่น ๆ อีกเพียบ
Tip: As I had been Placing collectively the testbed, I found Win98SE to be limiting the Super-G throughput success. When I switched the same Pc from functioning 98SE to WinXP Household, Tremendous-G common throughput (with all speed enhancements functioning) jumped from 29Mbps to about 37Mbps.
Broadcom alleges that Super-G’s channel bonding characteristic can substantially degrade the effectiveness of neighboring two.4GHz WLANs that don’t use Tremendous-G. Broadcom’s Comdex demos centered on demonstrating two Super-G behaviors that Broadcom says are the root of the problem:
Dynamic manner within an AP allows 802.11b, 11g, and Super-G STAs all affiliate and transfer facts and switches in channel bonding only when bandwidth calls for call for it.
In this particular NTK, I’ll initially describe what Tremendous-G is after which you can discover the key supply of Broadcom’s concern.
And although it’s accurate that two 11g WLANs can interfere with one another superg168 as Atheros contends, it’s only when both equally are operating full-tilt, and perhaps then, the interference is gone by the time the WLANs are separated by thirty toes – nicely in need of the one hundred feet that Atheros continues to be quoted as expressing will be the 11g interference zone.
As I described in my Comdex protection, the shorter story is the fact that Broadcom is asserting that Atheros’ Super-G based merchandise will interfere with neighboring 802.11b and g networks, severely limiting their speed and, in some cases, shutting them down completely.
But before you decide to go off questioning why Atheros would make “an 802.11g jammer” – to quote one Broadcom marketing exec, as opposed to a new common in wireless LAN functionality, continue on on to Part 2 of the Want To Know.